When people think about public relations, they
often think of a ‘PR Stunt,’ or some kind of advertisement or campaign meant to
draw attention, often on the verge of scamming the audience. People commonly
don’t trust public relations because it seems to promise with no delivery. Today,
public relations has built its own brand where honesty in information and
relationships is the most vital way to not only increase loyalty of consumers,
but to break down the walls of distrust with public relations itself. Over the
course of history, public relations has developed from a ridiculous notion to
the key to brand success and consumer retention.
History
It’s hard to pinpoint exactly where Public
Relations started because it came about when people began to persuade for an
organization or cause—where people began to reach out to the public. So,
really, where it can be traced back to is the Athenian rhetoricians with their
public speeches and writing to persuade the people of their ideas. Even Martin
Luther’s posting of the 95 Theses can be counted as early public relations.
(Lattimore et. al., 2009)
It wasn’t until about 300 years later that
modern public relations began to emerge through P.T. Barnum’s tactics to get
publicity for his circus—publicity solely for persuasion that ignored the truth
because it wasn’t interesting enough. It was his dishonest, outrageous
advertisements and displays that gave public relations a reputation of
deception for the sake of making money that carries on today.
Cover and page from Barnum Courier, 1883. 2010. Wikimedia Commons. Web. 2015 Dec. 9. Courtesy of Creative Commons. |
In the 1900’s, George Michaelis established the
Publicity Bureau where he essentially set the ground work for the focus on fact
over fiction with press releases by gathering information to publish in
newspapers in order to inform the public of current happenings.Through
distributing information, it was obviously more effective to communicate truth
to the public that would keep consumers’ trust and loyalty. Around the same
time, Ivy Lee defined public relations as a “management function” (Lattimore
et. al., 2009)—making public relations a more reputable medium for companies or
public figures to create a certain image and get their initiatives known to the
public.
After this, public relations even moved into
the political realm as President Theodore Roosevelt communicated to the United
States through press conferences and interviews. (Lattimore et. al., 2009) Once
again this emphasized persuasion through being honest with the public.
Several years later, exaggeration creeped back
in with perhaps the most memorable propaganda-filled public relations campaigns
put on by the government during World War One and Two. (Lattimore et. al.,
2009) Although these campaigns rallied loyalty and support for the war and the
country, the propaganda brought about negative perceptions of certain countries
and cultures.
As time went on, though, effective public
relations was adapted into businesses by Edward Bernays with promotional
events, Arthur Page of AT&T and his emphasis on connecting with customers,
and Moss Kendrix and his advertising campaigns. (Lattimore et. al., 2009) Soon,
departments and firms were established and public relations became more of a
professional affair in building a trustworthy image rather than just
initiatives to get attention.
According to Wren Ludlow, a current public
relations professional who attended BYU, the biggest changes in public
relations that will affect the careers of my peers and I are its convergence
with marketing, journalism and advertising. New developments in our era such as
social media and other technology have brought data and content for engaging
and strategic public relations efforts. All of these aspects contribute to more
efficient financial management and decision making. Organizations’ transparency
about this information is what fosters trusting, “mutually beneficial
relationships with key publics.”
Howle, Jason. Social Media Apps. 2013. Flickr. Web. 2015 Dec. 9. Courtesy of Creative Commons. |
Communication
and Loyalty
Over the course of this progression, public relations
has changed from being 100% about persuasion for business and has brought its
focus into being open and transparent with its audiences. This is an essential
part of the effectiveness of businesses today.
The purpose of public relations, as BYU
professors have said in classes is to ‘build mutually beneficial
relationships.’ Public relations professionals’ number one priority is to know
exactly what is needed to build that mutually beneficial relationship with a
public, individual, company, department, ect. in using effective communication
and persuasion tailored to that specific audience.
The purpose of public relations firms and
departments is also primarily to build up the image, or brand, of an
organization. In other words, the focus of my career is to use strategic
planning to increase the credibility of whoever/whatever I represent through
relationships, campaigns and other tactics to gain loyalty and trust.
In order to do this, I have to be aware of
current trends in society in order to make my communication kairotic enough for
people to pay attention. Emotional and logical appeal are then used
deliberately to craft messages with distinct rhetorical techniques designed for
each specific public.
Throughout all of these communication
techniques, the real loyalty comes from the transparency and vulnerability that
an organization offers. To tie this all together, I’ll use an example. When
Tylenol's reputation was as stake, Johnson & Johnson saved their image
(which is why Tylenol is still a household name) while creating a historic case
study:
In the Fall of 1982, cyanide was found in several bottles of Tylenol in the mid-west. Several people were fatally poisoned and a nationwide scare quickly arose due to extensive media coverage. Johnson&Johnson lost the trust of millions of customers as people suspected that they created dangerous products or may have been careless in the production process.
In the Fall of 1982, cyanide was found in several bottles of Tylenol in the mid-west. Several people were fatally poisoned and a nationwide scare quickly arose due to extensive media coverage. Johnson&Johnson lost the trust of millions of customers as people suspected that they created dangerous products or may have been careless in the production process.
Tylenol rapid release pills. Wikipedia. Web. 2015 Dec. 9. Courtesy of Creative Commons. |
In
order to fix this, Johnson&Johnson kept the public informed through news
and other media about what they were doing to find the source of the tragedy.
They also recalled their products, warning consumers not to partake of the
medication in case it might be dangerous. This strategy maintained consumer
trust and is the reason why we still see Tylenol on store shelves today. (Markel,
2014)
Analysis
This case study not only shows the value in
transparency, but how to utilize that transparency to be most effective. If
Johnson&Johnson had not been honest with their audience, they would have
lost the valuable relationship with consumers that kept them in business. By
being transparent, they were able to portray to consumers that their first
priority was the consumer’s health and lives rather than trying to salvage what
money they could from what was lost after recalling so many bottles of Tylenol.
This may seem counter-productive to the
business as a huge aspect of why businesses exist is to make money, but it
actually works for both sides. When a company is honest and willing to have
open communication, the customer feels cared about and connected to that
company. In turn, companies are able to retain a loyal audience and continue to
keep their business growing and being successful.
Overall, we have come a long way from the days
of P.T. Barnum’s tall tales meant to use deception as the main tactic for
drawing in attention and ultimately revenue. Today, public relations
professionals are kept honest not only through the success of their company,
but by the Public Relations Society of America and its authority, network and
code of ethics. To be transparent in public relations is almost not a choice,
as the consequence of being discovered for dishonest PR Stunts is the loss of
reputation, consumer loyalty and business as a whole. Looking at the whole
picture, public relations builds loyalty with honesty in businesses in order to
create its own image of honesty to earn the loyalty and trust of the public.
Works Cited
Lattimore, Dan, Otis Baskin, Suzzette T. Heiman, and Elizabeth L.
Toth. "The History of Public Relations." Public Relations: the Profession
and the Practice. 3rd ed. N.p.: Mcgraw-Hill Education, 2009. 25-43. PDF.
Markel, Howard. "How the Tylenol Murders of 1982 Changed the Way
We Consume Medication." PBS.
NewsHour Productions LLC., 29 Sept. 2014. Web. 09 Dec. 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment