Short Essay: Religion and Rhetoric
It has always been difficult to combine rhetoric with
religion. The art of persuasion can be used for bad and good, depending on the
intentions. Discovering when rhetoric is appropriate in religion, and vice
versa, is very important to understand, especially for those who are religious.
St. Augustine, for example, wasn’t one that was easily
impressed by the bible at first taste. He was an intelligent man, and his
intelligence was apart of why he first rejected Christianity. The un-eloquent
style of scripture seemed too dull for him to really grasp the true beauty
behind the message. Later down the road, St. Augustine converted to
Christianity when he realized that Plato’s teachings, alongside a lot of his
own ideals for moral living, crossed with Christianity. He soon discovered that
intellect, rhetoric and knowledge can be complimented by Christianity rather
than be an opposing force to it.
In our day, rhetoric can be tricky to master within religion,
specifically the skill of knowing when and how to say something. We believe it
is important as faithful LDS members to make our beliefs known, so when certain
conflicts arise we have a duty to defend our faith. A certain church policy
pertaining to married gay couples was brought forth over the past few months,
and caused a big division among LDS members. Online and social media outlets
became the firing tool for opinions and emotional expression towards this
policy, and soon turned a small flame into a billowing bonfire.
In class we discussed how using social media platforms
sometimes turns an individual voice into a mob-like mentality when others voiced
similar opinions. Instead of reacting rationally, most people were reacting
entirely out of emotion. They ignored, the “how” and “when” something is said
is crucial to properly defending what they believed. From this example we can
see how properly using rhetoric when it comes to religion can be tricky, but if
we are cautious about when and how we say things, rhetoric can be a great tool
in magnifying our beliefs.
Like Augustine, we should look for ways that religion and
rhetoric can compliment each other. His educational work was benefitted from
religion and vice versa. I too believe we can be greatly benefitted by striking
a balance between proper rhetoric and religion.
Short Essay #2: Rhetorical Anlaysis of Jacob 2-3
Jacob has a tough job to do in these chapters. He has been
tasked with a large load of topics and principles to call his brethren unto
repentance for. I noticed that at the beginning of his exhortation, he
establishes his ethos by
explaining the responsibility he has in magnifying his calling under the
command of God. He continues to add to his ethos as he describes in detail how
and when the Lord had asked him to preach unto his people. This credibility is
important to Jacob’s task, for if the people understood that these commandments
were from God, then they would feel more obligated to repent.
Jacob is distraught over the wickedness of his brethren and
explains the great wrath of the Lord that will come upon them if they choose to
continue in sin. He uses expressions like, “O that he…” and “O that ye…” which
are forms of anaphora, or a figure of
repetitive speech. He uses this form of repetition again in a following
verse that reads, “But before ye seek for riches, seek ye for the
kingdom of God.” This repetitive structure allows the reader to focus more on
the message in a way that is simple, memorable and powerful.
As chapter two continues, Jacob describes different forms of
sin, the punishment the Lord will inflict, and how they are to change if they
desire to be forgiven. When discussing the great iniquity of plural marriage,
Jacob makes a strong refutation
against ancient leaders, Solomon and David, who had many wives throughout their
lives. He gains great credibility to his refute by adding layer upon layer to
his argument of why such a practice is evil before God. At the close of chapter
two, Jacob uses comparison between
his brethren and the wicked Lamanites for them to grasp how evil their actions
had become. By comparing his brethren to their enemies, the Lamanites, the
grievous but powerful exhortation packed a good ending punch.
At the beginning of chapter three, Jacob uses description to define the
outcome of those who remain pure in heart and seek the Lord. This tactic is
seen throughout all of Jacob’s teachings, and without it, it would be difficult
to desire to obey God. All of these rhetorical elements combine to make a very
strong Deliberative speech
throughout both chapters. The prophet Jacob does an excellent job of
establishing the laws that have been broken, and the blessings that are given
when his brethren choose to obey God’s commandments.
No comments:
Post a Comment