Walter Bishop (Source: Google) |
They all died, young lady. Horrible and most likely painful death. You see, when you open new doors, there is a price to pay.
- Walter Bishop (Fringe)
I love Walter's ideas about being on the cutting edge, being on the fringe. He knows that doing great things involves high levels of risk. It is obvious that the characters is the Iliad paid a price similar - sometimes identical - to what Walter referred to when they too pushed the limits.
After reading posts by both Kevin and Eli, I first of all began to understand the rhetoric and also noticed the ethical appeals being made throughout the story. The instance that seemed most clear to me was when Minerva convinced Ulysses to continue the war and not to return home. She appealed to his character, asking him if he would let all the previous efforts and lives given go to waste. He had an opportunity to do something great, but it was also a risk with high reward. In the end, Walter was right.
Not really Thersites, but close to the description (Source: Google) |
These two examples show how much focus was put on the character of man. What I think is that Homer was questioning which of the Greek aretes was the most important. Strength, courage, war skills were obviously among some of the most revered virtues of the time. I think part of his rhetoric as the author of the story was to persuade the Greeks that perhaps there are more important virtues that one can have and that putting so much emphasis on war skills is not only barbaric, but can lead to tragedy just as it happened in the Iliad.
I really thought your comment about the thinking of all the things they have already accomplished, and that they can't abandon it was insightful. I think that happens all too much where we don't consider those events as sunk costs but rather obligate ourselves to pursue it.
ReplyDeleteI agree that Homer was trying to get the point across that when you focus on strength, courage and war skills too much then you're bound for tragedy. Too much pride will always be the means to an end.
ReplyDeleteI kind of feel bad for Thersites. His ideas were valid enough. Everyone else was ready to go home and many were probably thinking similar thoughts. Maybe they even agreed, but what could they do? Like you said, though, because he went up against his higher ups, he was beaten. Maybe if he would have said something earlier, more people would have sided with him. Interesting how position and timing can really effect how persuasive one can be. Also, I really like the picture, Kekoa.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete