Was Pericles’ funeral oration really an epideictic
masterpiece? The first time I read the
piece I thought it odd for a funeral speech; although there was praise I found
it more to be praise of Athens rather than praise of the soldiers. While reading Aristotle’s Rhetoric I found
some interesting insights to help categorize the type of rhetoric Pericles used
in his funeral oration.
Aristotle, when speaking of advisory rhetoric or
deliberative, states that the orator needs to give advice on what is
advantageous and good. He goes into
further detail by describing what makes something considered “good”. He includes courage and honor in the
definition. He states that “if be
cowards is the most advantageous thing for one’s enemies, it is evident that
courage is the most beneficial thing for the citizens” (Aristotle Rhetoric,
page 152). Pericles goes into great
detail to emphasize the importance of courage in the citizens of Athens. We may consider this praise but with
Aristotle’s insight we can view it in the light that Pericles was exhorting
them to continue to be courageous in war.
Was Pericles a master of disguise? |
When speaking of deliberative rhetoric Aristotle quotes
Pericles’ funeral oration (Aristotle Rhetoric, page 158). He then goes on to the importance of one who
is advising or warning to “grasp all forms of government” so that one may know
the things that are advantageous to them in order to preserve the form of
government (Aristotle Rhetoric, page 159).
Pericles goes into great deal praising the democracy in Athens. As a political leader this was important to
him and he wanted to preserve it. I feel
that instead of praising the soldiers who had died, Pericles used the
opportunity to encourage the people to continue to fight for the form of
government that they had established which was superior in his viewpoint. He even encouraged the women to have more
children which could eventually become soldiers and protect the magnificent
Athens.
In my understanding from Aristotle’s Rhetoric, I would
classify Pericles’ Funeral Oration as a deliberative piece although the setting
seemed appropriate for an epideictic speech.
Interesting how Pericles did that. But I guess it just shows how aware he was of his audience and kairos. From the text, we can assume already had in mind this purpose of advising his people and doing less epideictic oratory than the situation called for. This would thus actually put him more in line with Socrates as far as "morals of speaking" go because of his a priori thinking--contrary to what I was thinking before.
ReplyDelete