In his
treatise De Oratore, Cicero claims that in order to master oratory
first you need to learn the rules, then to practice. There is a very
noticeable application of this statement when you notice the notice the
difference between this treatise and Cicero’s former, De Inventione. In
his early life, Cicero focused on simply stating and learning the rules for
delivery and memory, but it becomes apparent that after years of experience and
his use of dialogue he masters the art of eloquence (169). This same
observation was made by Hailee,
who feels more enlightened by the dialogue approach given in De Oratore than
the list of concepts given in De Inventione.
How does
dialogue incite a different response from an audience than simply rehearsing a
system of rules? I think it has a lot to do with the level of style. Cicero
uses dialogue as a middle/high level of style, which both pleases the audience
and moves them to think about rhetoric differently. For instance,
Cicero introduced humor in De Oratore when he responds to
Crassus’ comment on not being educated on oratory. He says “’By all
means listen to a man discuss a topic which he never learned!” De
Inventione addressed the audience with a lower form of style. Its
primary purpose was to inform and to teach. It was definitely more
concise, but less entertaining.
I feel like entertainment is a major factor in De Oratore. Cicero is a better orator and rhetorician now, so he feels he can entertain his audience better through a dialogue now that he knows the tricks of the trade.
ReplyDelete