English Teaching can often be quite stressful! |
Every day
of the week, English teachers are constantly in some sort of conflict where
they must convince others. An extremely common point of conflict, or
stasis, in English teaching is how to best teach the students. Disagreements often arise between English
teachers and other English teachers or, more likely, between English teachers
and administrators on how to best teach and engage the children.
Take this
common scenario of conflict.
Principal
Collins, fuming, burst into Mr. Rice’s classroom early last Friday. In a rage, she demanded to know why he
refused to teach Shakespeare’s Romeo and
Juliet to his 9th grade class this semester and taught them the
more “mature” Othello instead. “This violates the state and the board’s
educational laws and outlines! There
will be a standardized test at the end of this year, and you haven’t taught
them the necessary material!” she seethed.
Mr. Rice sighed. He hated
teaching Romeo and Juliet. The class consistently became much more
engaged in Othello than in Romeo and Juliet, and he had looked at
the test objectives. They required
perhaps a small summary of the play and nothing more. Why, he wondered, did he have to teach his
class anything but what he wanted to teach them? They would get everything covered that they
needed to cover. Grammar, essay writing,
literature, everything needed would be taught.
Mr. Rice stated slowly, “Ms. Collins, I take great pride in teaching my
class and helping them learn and grow in English. My students’ standardized test results
consistently have been 20% higher than the state’s average, and I see no reason
to deviate from my proven method no matter how much the state or board changes
the requirements or curriculum.” “Your
job is a good reason, Mr. Rice,” Ms. Collins simpered.
English teachers may not want to teach the standardized curriculum for their class. |
Here we see
a special topic of invention common to public school English teachers. The idea of the law vs. personal desire
occurs quite a bit. Mr. Rice wants to
teach what he wants to teach in English.
However, the state dictates that he teach a certain curriculum to his
students. Mr. Rice might be a better
English teacher without the restrictions of the curriculum, but he, by law,
must teach a certain way or he will lose his job. The common topics of invention of law and
cause and effect also occur with this special topic. Law or at
least school board doctrine must always be taken into account in Mr. Rice’s
teaching. Furthermore, Principal
Collins
thinks that if Mr. Rice fails to teach his students the proper curriculum, the
students will fail the standardized tests.
Another special topic of invention seen in this scenario is learning vs.
curriculum. Sometimes learning does not
occur even with approved curriculum. Mr. Rice must struggle between teaching approved curriculum and teaching what he feels is best conducive to learning. Reconciliation can occur with the style he teaches.
Engagement’s relationship to learning is yet an additional special topic. Mr. Rice thinks that the more engaged a class
is in a topic, the more they will learn. I do not think anyone doubts this fact, but trying to engage students is a classic problem for all teachers everywhere.
Is it really true that the state dictates laws about what can and cannot be taught in schools? I feel like that has to be some sort of vialation of the first ammendment or something. Maybe thats why private and charter schools are becoming more and more popular... I had no idea
ReplyDeleteWell, there are state-mandated and school board ordinances which are basically treated as law because if you do not follow them, you do not get state funding. It is more of an incentive, but I feel like it fits best under the general topic of law!
DeleteI really enjoyed your post, as I moved through a couple of different high schools and now universities I saw differences in how things are done as far as curricula and how effective learning happens. I've never really thought about how hard it must be for teachers to try and engage less enthusiastic students, that really takes a lot of convincing ability and rhetorical power. Teachers are so under appreciated. Thanks for your post!
ReplyDelete