In the New Testament, from Philippians 3:2, Paul states “Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers,
beware of concision.” The rhetoric inherent in this declaration and warning
by Paul really sheds some understanding on what Paul is trying to accomplish in
this passage. Below are some of the possible rhetorical figures that Paul is
using to create this expression.
Epitheton/Aganactesis
This type of language, attributing a person to a quality or specific adjective,
in this case is meant to be highly insulting, abusive, or highly critical. Silvia Rhetoricae states that aganactesis is “an exclamation proceeding from
deep indignation.” In analyzing these three very negative epithets it is
important to put them in context of Paul’s day. The word dog back then was meant to be an extremely derogatory term.
Sarcasm This
is the rhetorical use of mockery and/or verbal taunts not done in a polite or
joking manner. Paul attempts to use sarcasm here to put down his detractors and
give them the appearance as people who should not only be avoided but also not
be taken seriously.
The rhetorical analysis of these two figures help us to
understand Paul’s mission here on a larger scale. There is no direct message
from the gospel’s detractors here, just the detractors themselves is what Paul
attacks. Understanding that Paul is directly putting down his and the gospels
opponents shows that Paul felt it was important to defend his own apostleship
and the authority given to him, an idea that for members of the LDS faith would
make a lot of sense. There are also a few more rhetorical figures at work in
this passage, such as repetition, which continue to support the idea that Paul
felt it was important to put down those that did not have proper authority from
God.
I also think that this passage includes climax as concision is the worst in this series. Dogs are not as bad as evildoers and evildoers are not as bad as concision. Concision, rather than meaning conciseness in this verse, means the act of wrongfully and painfully circumcising a person or mutilating the flesh. Ouch!!
ReplyDeleteThanks for defining "concision," Katie! I didn't understand the meaning of the scripture based upon my dictionary's definition.
ReplyDelete