In an effort to persuade the audience, Augustine relies
heavily on the testimony and documentation of the prophets of old to fuel his
main rhetorical function of teaching.
The fast majority of his discourse relies on his ability to instruct the
audience on the nature and intricacies of repentance and forgiveness. Augustine
goes to great length to implement the Lord’s Prayer as median to instruct the
people. He quotes the line “forgive us our debts” from the that Prayer implying
that none in attendance could sincerely utter that line to the Lord if he has
not already at least attempted to repentant to those whom we have wronged and
forgive those who have wronged us. Furthermore, Augustine makes meticulous work
of teaching the need to forgive those who have wronged us and then let go. He
makes it abundantly clear that once we have forgiven those who have offended,
we need not be concerned with that act any more. He ingrains his point into the
reader with effective use of anaphora.
Though his main rhetorical function is a low level of just
teaching, he definitely amps up his speech by calling to action. Inherent in
teaching about repentance and forgiveness is an appeal to be repentant and be
forgiving. Though this high level of style was in the vast minority for the
bulk of the sermon, I think the ratio seems appropriate. One would be hard
pressed to sustain such a high level of style for an extended period of time. Furthermore,
it would be extremely stressful for the audience to be called to action, either
directly or indirectly, for an overly extended period. At the end of the day,
Augustine does an excellent job teaching the people why they need to repent and
helping motivate everyone to do so.
How does he use anaphora (what examples stood out to you), and why is it significant, it your opinion?
ReplyDeleteHey Alex, I think you did a good job analyzing Augustine's sermon. I think what you said about Augustine's use of high and low styles was appropriate and accurate. I think in a church sermon, as most general conference talks, we see lots of low syle speckled with high style in the opportune moments. I think he was effective not based on "how much" high he used, but "when" he used it. Teaching the doctrine from scriptures and personal testimony helped him set the mood for him to persuade them to action. "true doctrine understood changes behavior" but some will still need the invitation.
ReplyDeleteAs I was thinking about high and low styles I thought a lot about missionary work and the types of styles I primarily used while teaching others.