I firmly believe that few things in our world were created with harmful intentions. However, I'm not oblivious to the fact that there is often a gap between intent and ultimate use. For example, Orville and Wilbur Wright intended their airplane to be used as a new means of transportation, not a bomb delivery service as it was subsequently used in the war. Or, individual medicines created for the preservation of the body that are now used in harmful combinations and illegal activities. Gorgias said that when skills are used poorly the teachers “aren't the ones who are corrupt, and the art is not to blame…” (pg 41).
The Wright Brother's Airplane |
I agree that Elder Bednar is well aware that that his audience consists of multiple age groups. I've noticed in this and other addresses that he usually defines the terms he uses so that people age 8 to 800 can understand what he's talking about.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very poignant article of how we blame the invention and not the corrupter of it. Rhetoric isn't inherently evil like Socrates claims, he is too focused on the abuse of it. I like how you pointed out that airplanes aren't evil, but sometimes they are used in a way which can be construed as destructive or even evil.
ReplyDeleteI totally noticed the same thing about Socrates stopping Gorgias and then correcting him by using solid rhetoric applications. I wrote something similar in my pos. I also agree completely at the way that both Bednar and Socrates build their ethos. Good point about them both being teachers.
ReplyDelete