History and Greek Civilization
Because history is the past of the winners, and Athens definitely won to history, Pericles was right that future ages will wonder at Athens. We do so today. |
Pericles’s
speech reveals Athenian civilization in two ways: the traditions and pride. Pericles mentions that he does not want to
give the speech because the bravery of the soldiers speaks for
themselves. However, it is his duty to honor his ancestors and
traditions. Pericles, though, focused much more on the pride and glory of
Athens. According to Pericles, Athenians have natural bravery
instead of Spartan state-induced bravery. The Athenians also pride
themselves on working alone and not needing allies. Athenians enjoy living in a world where
beauty, things of the mind, bravery, politics, and service live harmoniously. Athens
is an “education to Greece” and "future ages will wonder at us.” However,
Pericles is only at least partly employing propaganda because Athens had its problems. However,
history is not the truth of the past but a reconstruction of the winner’s memories. So
Athens, the winner, is a golden city to Pericles.
Employing Ethos
Pericles
establishes his ethos mostly through emotional appeal. Though he already had great ethos because he
was a leading statesman in Athens, he mentioned none of his accomplishments during his speech, which actually
increased his ethos. He instead establishes
ethos mostly through pathos. When he
says a speech is not necessary because of the bravery of the soliders, he is
being sympathetic to the mourners. He
uses the word “we” instead of “you” to connect him with his audience. Once he has the audience firmly on his side
through his pathos, he is able to give the mourners advice to have more
children, and they will take his advice.
Socrates vs. Pericles
Socrates would question even the most mundane so he would definitely question the bravery of the Athenian soldier. |
Socrates would have approached this
funeral oration very differently than Pericles.
I imagine that he would attempt to discover if the dead soldiers were actually
brave or only acting on orders. He would question the mourners about
their sons and brothers and their character. He would not dote on
Athens for more than half the speech but attempt to expose its
corruption. Under his motto that “an unexamined life is not worth living”
Socrates would bring the hard questions to light as opposed to Pericles’s
epideictic, praising oration.
was most interested in knowing absolute truth. I even conjecture that unlike Adam's thoughts, Pericles represented the Sophist thought. Sophists were pragmatic, and Pericle’s advice
to have more children and to women quiet were pragmatic thinkings taken from a
difficult situation. Pericles based himself
in real life events, not in theory.
Great thoughts! I really enjoyed your part on Socrates vs Pericles. My post actually presents the opposite idea that Pericles' oration would have been classified as Socratic. Although as I mention at the beginning of that section I definitely think that Socrates as a person would not agree with Pericles' methods.
ReplyDeleteRegarding, the ethos you discussed, I agree completely. In fact that was one of the first things that I noticed. Here is a leader who is deciding to speak in the first person plural as opposed to a combination of first person singular and 2nd person plural. I feel like most leaders would stick with the latter to show off their power. But Pericles doesn't and it definitely builds his ethos.
I don't know if we can confine Pericles' speech to only one category of philosophy. The point that you bring up, Katie, about Socrates and absolute truth is a good one, and I agree that there are many things he would question, but I also think that he and Pericles would share in the ideas of Absolutes. Neither one seem to care much for relativism, and Pericles and Socrates would seem to agree that there is Good and Bad in this world along with greater and lesser virtues
ReplyDelete