After seeing probably my first play since grade
school, I was quite impressed with the production. Of note, both Hecuba and Polymestor made
excellent displays of mimesis and the art of persuasion. Obviously, one was more vindicated than the
other, no doubt due to Hecuba's exposing of Polymestor as a greedy liar (and
possibly because he spat too much). Both
appealed to Agamemnon over the murder of Polydorus, with Hecuba raging for
justice and Polymestor defending with claims of protecting against any future
instances of war.
In the end, Polymestor cannot stand fast against the
buffetings of his sons' murderer. It
might have been easier if he had still been able to see so that he could have
just killed Hecuba, but that was not the case.
Unfortunately for Polymestor, his appeal to patria was not enough to
deter Agamemnon from the blind greed so readily apparent in the childless
father. Hecuba had lost her husband to
war, Polydorus to the gold frenzied Polymestor, and one of her daughters to
sacrificial retribution. She was an old
woman stricken with age and all manner of misdeed. As she so expertly convinced to Agamemnon,
there was no lower point for her to fall.
Seeing as she had nothing to lose and Polymestor had much to gain, the
honesty of their feelings was easily distinguishable.
It was this honesty combined with hard logic that
allowed Hecuba to eventually win over Agamemnon. In the eyes of Agamemnon, the distraught
mother's actions had been fair and justified, whereas the slithering Polymestor
clearly had acted only in his own self-interest. If the play had been an act of public
speaking rather than just amongst a select few, Polymestor could very well have
won the debate. His reasoning was sound,
so his case would most likely have been supported amongst the masses. This was not as effective as hoped for,
however, as the debate parties were small enough that Hecuba could appeal to
the individual rather than to the faceless crowd. Having the ability to pinpoint and focus on
Agamemnon's vital regions, she overpowered her opposition's standpoint with a
potent hybrid of logos and pathos, successfully avenging her lost family.
Audience definitely influenced Polydorus's and Hecuba's speeches about who was wrong. Did Hecuba commit a terrible crime (murder and violence), yes, but we ourselves are convinced that Hecuba is in the right. The mimesis of the actor of Polydorus also makes us feel that he is despicable. If he had acted in a different, more sympathetic manner, we might not have supported Hecuba as much.
ReplyDeleteHecuba also had the advantage of having nothing else to lose, as you pointed out. Since Agamemnon knew this he also knew that she had no reason to lie about what she did or why she did it.
ReplyDelete