“Happiness is reached when a man is ready to be what he is.”
(Desiderius Erasmus, 1466-1536)
As we browse the various Colleges within any major University we
are sure to see one labeled Humanities. These Colleges developed directly from
the rich historical philosophies and traditions within Humanism—a branch of classical philosophy
called, in Latin, “humanitas”—which was reintroduced in Italy during the
early European Renaissance by the scholar Petrarch (as explained by Joseph
Pearson in his blog post, “Reborn
from the ashes”).
Why then, if Petrarch helped facilitate the rebirth of Humanism, was Desiderius
Erasmus called the “Prince of Humanism”? Well, it boils down to the following: When
it came to Humanism, Erasmus was a man that practiced what he preached; we
rarely find those two actions in congruence.
Though he educated
himself at many renowned Universities, Erasmus considered himself an
independent and nonpartisan scholar. He embraced a system of thought that gave
primacy to human beings rather than the divine (though he
expressed deep respect for the Catholic Magisterium). With correspondences to
more than five-hundred men involved in politics and philosophy, Erasmus was at
the center of the literary movement in his generation. He was an example that
we can emulate in 2015 by speaking up and speaking on important issues.
Erasmus challenged the medieval views of Academia and the Catholic
Church with his satirical writing by addressing the innate value and potential
of human beings as well as the issues we all face. To top it off, Erasmus
accomplished his influence—entering many discussions with serious religious
topics and political figures—without taking sides or being marginalized by
political leaders. The scholars that he corresponded with respected the way he
expressed his humanist ideals. That, my friends, is Humanitarian Swag—when
we can persuasively argue yet still be agreeable.
And I would add - That is powerful Rhetoric! It is clear from your post, although it wasn't the focus of what you talked about, that Erasmus was a master of Rhetoric. Being able to have some of the views that he did and being able to correspond with those that wouldn't be in full agreement with him, would have probably required Erasmus to have a great knowledge of kairos and decorum.
ReplyDeleteAnd being the first individual to translate/transcribe the Bible into both Greek and Latin didn't hurt his public, religious, or academic image either! He definitely legitimized himself with several accredited endeavors.
Delete