
When wondering whether or not clothing has benefitted
mankind, Montaigne theorizes, “Now, all other creatures [are] sufficiently
furnished with all things necessary for [their] support,…it is not to be
imagined that we…are brought…defective…and in such a state as cannot subsist
without external aid.”
This conclusion has far reaching ideas. If nature gives
mankind what it needs to survive, than are we better off by upsetting that
order or are we better off by letting nature take its course? Today this
concept comes to a head with the idea of social media and modern civilization.
Does social media further our civilization or does it hinder it? The way that
communication has happened for millennia is that it is face to face, there is a
tangible person for every bit of information that is passed. Isocrates noted
the importance of speech: “Since we have the ability to [communicate]…we have
come together, built cities, made laws, and invented arts.
Speech (logos) is responsible
for nearly all our inventions.” Nature designed us to come together and
speak to one another such that we build relationships, such that we grow, such
that we are together when speaking.
But in a world with social media, there doesn’t need to be
anyone behind a statement. Anonymity is rampant and other forms of
communication are dying off. As a missionary I witnessed this. I entered my
mission and was sent out tracting the day I landed. But soon social media was
introduced to my mission and we became a Facebook mission. As the days passed
Facebooking became a bigger part of missionary life and tracting slunk away to
the outskirts. By the end of my mission I had companions who could have message
threads with a dozen people going on at the same time, but he could not talk to
a new person on the street.
Now, on the other hand there is something to be said of this
new way of communicating. As I stated above, you can have personal
communication with a dozen or more people all at the same time, something
unheard of in previous ages.
What will the future
bring as we explore this brave new world of social communication? Only time
will tell, but if history is our guide some people will thrive (like the Europeans
of the renaissance) and some will die (like the Native Americans they came into
contact with).
I wonder what the men of the past would have thought about social media. I wonder if Petrarch would have wanted to emulate a nameless faceless person behind an avatar or if Columbus would have rather stayed at home messaging the Indians rather that go for a boat ride to the American Indies. I wonder if the shield of a username prevents man from exercising his sprezzatura. I often feel like I live in a world more comparable to Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, than Columbus' expeditions.
ReplyDeleteFirst of all: wonderful job with the quotes, using parallelism and assonance, and presenting both sides of the argument.
ReplyDeleteSecond of all (AKA last because "all" is only 2): INDEED! This topic is just. What can we do about it? There's the so good, and the so bad, and people have a hard time fitting into the in between. Do usernames "shield" us like Kekoa said? ..Or do they empower us?