He begins the sermon to the clergy by giving them deference
and tries to portray himself (Ethos) as a humble co-servant of theirs. As the sermon develops he takes on a more
authoritative tone and begins to admonish the clergy at large. In particular, he appeals to the scriptures
to both validate his argument and appeal to the spiritual sensitivities of the
clergy. His use of the scriptures
enables him to chastise his audience with respect to corruption and general
wickedness.
He appeals to their sense of honor and responsibility as
they are caretakers of the church and congregations. As is adequate, Colet’s tone is respectful of
them and their station yet it does not keep him from being firm. In addition, he is both eloquent and sincere
in his attempts to rectify what he sees as poor behavior in his fellowmen. Fitting again is his medium of oration. The ability to speak to his colleagues in
person allows for the greatest impact.
I've always wondered how people balance between meekness and boldness. If one is meek, they can be seen as humble but it is easy to be overlooked. Being bold allows other's to notice you but you can be seen as bossy or even intimidating. It is interesting for Colet to follow that pattern though because it is the pattern followed in the scriptures. Echoing the tone throughout the scriptures adds that much more validity to the words.
ReplyDeleteI think it is this balance that made his piece and Erasmus' piece so much more appealing to me than Luther's sermon we discussed in class. The fire and brimstone approach is alienating. Colet's tone really does soften the audience and make them more willing to ponder his point.
ReplyDelete