The great fire of Rome, 69 AD |
Early Christians were blamed for a fire in Rome and persecuted because of it. Paul tried to give them strength through his letters. Protestant reformers were burned alive by the Catholic Church at an alarming rate. John Calvin tried to bring Protestants together in his preaching on suffering persecution. Mormons were driven from their homes and tarred and feathered. Joseph Smith preached courage and faith.
These three instances are tied together through a process
called rhetorical identification. Coined by a theorist named Kenneth Burke,
identification (a very watered-down version) happens when a person relates to
another through the use of speech or writing. As members of the LDS church, we
identify with Protestants and the early Christians because they were persecuted
like we were persecuted. We draw strength from those examples that helps us in
our own struggles. Maybe that identification is one of the reasons why the
Church focuses so much on Luther and Protestantism and ignores Erasmus, as we
discussed in class yesterday. We identify with the Protestants more in their
struggles as a beginning religion.
By using examples of Paul and the early Christians in his
suffering persecution speech, Calvin also tried to help his followers identify
with those people and gain strength from them. As a rhetor, Calvin tried to
promote change through identifying with others. He helped them see the
identification through rhetorical questions and scriptural analogies to their
own lives. Judging by the Protestant reformation’s success, I’d say Calvin was
pretty successful.
You may very well have a point about why we associate with luther more than erasmus. I looked up identification rhetoric and it seems like it is saying that identification is what makes rhetoric persuasive. it seems that it can be the speaker identifying himself with the audience, or the speaker identifying the audience with another group.
ReplyDelete