After reading Jon's post, I changed my perspective of 'Pericles' Funeral Oration so that I could see it in a little bit of a better focus in terms of why and how Pericles approached his agenda.

This is comparable to the way that we remind each other of the Plan of Salvation at LDS funerals so that we can move on with our lives in the knowledge that death has a purpose. For example, Pericles tells the Athenians that death brings an honor that is no longer "liable to the jealousy of one’s competitors, but...sincere and unchallenged." To the Athenians, this appeals to them pathetically as they can relate to the desire for that kind of honor and they can find solace in the fact that the ones they love have reached that aspiration. This is also logical because of their societal emphasis on honor and authority. The dead are painted as honored figures for the living to aspire to become. Finally, this is an ethical argument because Pericles, an authority, is addressing them and they honor his words because authority is important to them. This use of rhetoric shows the Athenians that this mass death was not in vain.

In all of these things, Pericles creates a judicial, epideictic and deliberative conversation by prompting the people to 1) honor, defend and glorify the valiant that they have lost from their society as he does 2) celebrate pretty much the awesomeness of Athenian culture and conduct/praise the virtue of their society right now and 3) continue being and raise more children to be similarly courageous in society while seeking "rewards of valor."
When you commented on Pericles' appeals to ethos, I might disagree: I think his credentials might actually have an adverse influence on how his message was received. After all, as a mighty general in the Peloponnesian War, he was mightily responsible for the deaths of those carted on the biers.
ReplyDelete