Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Double Trouble

There are two different authors to analyze when examining Pericles’ funeral oration at the end of the first year of the Peloponnesian war.  The obvious speaker is Pericles.  Primarily, he uses an emotional appeal (pathos) in epideitic speech to strengthen the morale of his fellow citizens.  Naturally, the kairos of this situation lends itself to an inspiring speech.  If I were an Athenian in the beginning years of a war, I imagine that I would ask myself, “Is it worth it to fight this war?”  Not only did he have great timing, but Pericles knew his audience well because he appealed to their sense of sophistication and civility.  For example, he said, “It is more the case of our being a model to others than of our imitating anyone else” (pg. 3, line 27-28).  The Athenians loved to think themselves a notch above the rest.  And there couldn’t have been a better circumstance, nor speaker.  Pericles had a well established reputation as a learned politician and a great military general (ethos).  The Greeks admired the ability to speak well and great physical prowess.  Pericles had both. 
                In addition to the setting of the speech, the form of the speech is intriguing.  As in many epideitic speeches, Pericles calls his listeners to their Athenian ancestors and the battles they fought.  But he interestingly dips into a more judicial, logos mode as he defends the reputation of his fallen troops.  “We ought to remember first is their gallant conduct against the enemy in defense of their native land.  They blotted out their evil with good…” (page 6, line 14-16).  Personally, I believe that most of his speech was deliberative.  In praising the education, military planning, and political system of Athens, Pericles seems, to me, to have been urging the legislators to continue upholding the standards of life that Athens enjoyed. 

               
A quick word on Thucydides.  His opinion was jaded.  He greatly admired Pericles, but he was also an exile of Athens because of his failed military leadership.  I wholeheartedly agree with Andrew when he said, “Despite his dedication to the truth, what one speaks or recounts can only ever be a translation of what actually happened. Personal bias is bound to creep in.”  Thucydides did seem to take a jab at the Athenians when he interpreted (with bias?), “if our enemies engage a detachment of our forces and defeat it, they give themselves credit for having thrown back our entire army” (p. 4, l. 26), which is exactly what happened to him.  History, alas, isn’t perfect.

4 comments:

  1. These people have just experienced something traumatizing, and in order for Pericles to sooth their aches and pains of loosing loved ones in the war, he keeps his speech positive, giving praise, and also advice for coping with the loss. He indeed was well aware of his audience's standpoint, and wanted to be a helpful hand in lifting their spirits a little.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As much as rhetoric is a great tool for relaying history to an audience that wasn't present at the time of an event, I agree with you that bias always tends to creep in. From events like this where rhetoric is so beautifully used, we can never fully know if an account is without bias and fully true... makes me wonder how biased a lot of accounts we read from history really are.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your insight to Pericles' use of logos is one I hadn't seen myself, but what you say is absolutely true. He appeals to reason to support his argument.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You used pathos pretty well yourself. Great use of putting yourself in their shoes to find out the kairos and how you'd react.

    ReplyDelete