
The audience for Charter 77 can be seen as everyone in
Czechoslovakia during that particular time. It was mainly to get the Government’s
attention of what the people felt was happening with current rule, but also to
inform the people themselves. The audience today can be anyone who feels they
should stand up for what they believe in. It gives us hope that courage to
express your views exists and can be successful.
The group of people who wrote/backed Charter 77 were blaming
the current government system for not backing up their words with actions. This
is evidence of vituperation. For example, in Article 13 of the Helsinki
Declaration, it states that everyone has the right to education. But numerous
times, children would be prevented from studying because of their views or
their parents views. Lots of emotion was put into this document. It was
technically illegal, but Vaclav and lots of others felt strongly about “freeing”
themselves from this Government who would not allow the people the rights they
deserved. Repetition is used throughout this document in the form of these kinds of examples
that all point out these basic rights, and why the people deserve better.
I could see Vaclav reading this document as a firm, direct
speech to whoever was willing to listen, which I would assume would be a lot. It is a call to change, and that is what he did. This document would
eventually lead to an overthrow of communism at the end of 1989 and the election of Vaclav Havel
as President of the new Czech Republic in 1990.
Great analysis! I'm wondering if there might have been a more specific audience for this address, and if not what specifically about the audience you identified made Vaclav Havel choose the rhetorical appeals/approaches/methods that he used? This is a fairly modern speech relative to the one I read, and the others that I heard about in class today, but I have noticed that the audience really does make up what the rhetorician decides to say. Personally, this is always my favorite thing to analyze because you can weed out the "wheat from the tares" with respect to who knows rhetoric and how to adjust to the kairos of the situation.
ReplyDelete