Russia was at war with Japan, and Japan was soundly
defeating the Russians. Even though the Russians were badly losing, their tsar
Nicholas II refused to end the war. Many soldiers were needlessly dying. On top
of that, the working class of Russians were being treated very poorly.
Lenin blames the rich capitalists for every ill of society.
Without regard to anything else, he piles hate on top of them, blaming them for
“rivers of blood”, exploitation, and making “the government and army their servants….” Blood is strongly alluded to in this piece. Being engaged in
a war, the people of Russia would have very tangible ideas associated with
blood. Lenin refers to the capitalistic, rich owners of capital as “blood-suckers.”
Imagine having an enemy shed the blood of your son or brother, how would you
feel about being oppressed under a “blood-sucker”?
Interestingly, he never really uses plural pronouns like “we”
or “us”. When he is trying to get the people up in arms he states that the
revolution has already begun. “The workers of all lands are fighting to free
labour from wage slavery” he cried to the people. The story he tells is a
compelling one. He describes so many of the ills that the laborers have had to
deal with, whether it is working their hands to the bone, or begging for
permission to work, they all have had issues with these capitalists.
Imagine the imagery of a bloody river for those who had just lost loved ones in the war |
In communicating to these laborers he gives the sense that
he is truly present. At the end of his speech he calls for the workers to go to
action! Every sentence begins with “Let” and ends with an exclamation point.
Such parallelism leads to a convincing climax! Then he closes with another
parallelism, followed by antithesis: “Long live the eight-hour day! Long live
the international revolutionary Social-Democracy! Down with the criminal and
plundering tsarist autocracy!” Long live us, down with the tsar. The whole
speech builds up to that moment.
In order to get to that moment, the topics of invention that
Lenin employs are definition, for he defines the working class as beggars and
the working class as blood-suckers. He references cause and effect a lot. The
upper classes have been putting down the lower classes and thus the natural
conclusion to that is that the lower classes revolt and throw off the upper
classes. Comparison is also used extensively to highlight the differences
between the classes. In all, he effectively gets the people enraged enough to
overthrow the government (albeit a few years later).
I enjoyed this analysis! I think it's important to pay close attention to manipulations of pronouns--in my opinion, I think it's one of the most powerful tools a speaker can use to create a strong sense of ethos (which can lead to a united "pathos" too) within an argument.
ReplyDelete