Audience Profile
With my essay, English Teaching majors will be able to understand why rhetoric and communication is vital in the classroom! |
A
typical English Teaching major will take many literature, English language,
grammar, and teaching courses to prepare them to teach in a secondary education
setting (high school). Almost all
curriculum will address communication in some way. Communication will be found through
literature and the importance of literature on communication, how to
communicate correctly with grammar, and how to teach effectively to
adolescents. The teaching classes are by
far the most suited toward rhetoric because teachers must develop ethos,
pathos, and logos in order to help their students learn. Furthermore, classes like History of the
English language will provide a context or overview for the profession. Following these courses, there is a
professional element, which includes student teaching or an internship as well
as classes on special teaching topics like teaching in a multicultural setting
or teaching those with disabilities. The
student teaching portion of the major is the best time to get a hands-on
experience on how to communicate well to perform effectively as a high school
English teacher. In preparation for
getting a job, BYU’s university career services can help English teaching
majors apply for jobs, write an effective resume, and interview well.
Context
The
most meaningful context I can provide for someone who might be considering an
English Teaching Major is to expound upon the noble virtue of teaching. Although teachers are neither the most paid
nor most revered professionals in the world, there is something highly
gratifying and noble about teaching.
Students can be inspired to go on to be successful simply through a
great teacher. Sticking to the focus
that teaching is a noble and wonderful profession will be the best way to
persuade readers to focus on my essay. To
persuade readers to pay attention to issues of communication in the English
teaching major, I will remind them of bad teachers that they have had. Most bad teachers lack basic knowledge of how
to communicate and persuade effectively.
They do not understand the fundamental issue between learning and
engaging the student. They do not know
how to add personal touches to curriculum.
They often do not know how to dress to fit the part of a personable professional. Everyone wants to be successful, so I will
convince them that the best way to be a successful English teacher will be to
communicate effectively.
Rhetoric
I
will need to present in my paper the general ideas of ethos, pathos, and logos
in my paper and how each applies to effective communication in English
teaching. General methods of high,
middle, and low style should be addressed so that the teachers can know what
style to address their students at a given time. They should know both when to listen to the
students and when to be the speaker.
Specifically, persuasive strategies in regard to effective
e-communication (email, blog, social media and other effective technologies)
should also be addressed. How to teach
personally with an impersonal curriculum is another specific topic that is
needed for effective persuasion and communication. I can address the 3 different persuasive
appeals and the 3 different levels of styles without necessarily naming them in
rhetorical jargon. Rather I can use
synonyms like “logical argument” for logos and “an entertaining style” for
middle style.
History
To
give useful perspective, I can focus on how language and grammar teaching has
influenced history. I can focus on the
Sophists’ speech writing instructions and handbooks and Quintillian’s
progymnasmata. This historical focus
will allow readers to see the scope of how important and ancient the art of
teaching language is.
Developmental Plan
I will divide my paper into three
distinct sections—persuasion and communication in the classroom, persuasion and
communication on an individual basis, and persuasion and communication with the
staff and faculty. In order to be a
successful professional and teacher, English teaching majors must be proficient
in communication to these three different groups. For each of these groups, I will explain the
different styles and ways of communicating that will be most effective per
group (for example, clarity and repetition in a lecture might be extremely
helpful in the classroom, but it might be better to have a dialogue with little
repetition for individual communication).
I will attempt to add a little historical context if it applies. I will need to add some new information that
is not taken from my blog posts in regard especially to faculty
interaction. I will need to know how
faculty communicates effectively.
The section on in the classroom and
to the individual will be the most important sections. The people you will influence the most as a
teacher will be the students, not the faculty.
Telling the stories about Ms. Evans and Mr. Rice will be the most
effective in explaining how to communicate well to students and to faculty.
I really like what you said in your developmental plan about separating your paper into three sections to address the different kinds of communication for each group english teachers communicate with. I want to apply this in my paper too. It is the perfect solution for how to address the differences in communication between the speech pathologist and the client, the speech pathologist and the family, and the speech pathologist and the insurance companies. For some reason in my head I had limited myself to structuring my paper with a history section, a rhetoric in the field section, and a context section how we outlined in this post. Thank you for the idea!
ReplyDelete