“Those who cannot remember the past, are condemned to repeat
it”
Quoted by George Santayana in the year 1905. As
a philosopher, essayist, poet, and novelist living in Italy, George spoke the
words of one bouncing off renaissance and reformist ideas. If one had no
knowledge of the past, or did not learn enough, repeated mistakes are bound to
happen. I am reminded of an example of my brother in high school getting pulled
over by the same cop, in the same spot, for the same mistake (not wearing a
seat belt), at the same time back to back days. He obviously did not learn from
the past, and therefore was condemned to repeat it.
Pondering over this quotation, I found that it linked quite
well with what was taught by Martin Luther in the late 15th/early 16th
century. He quoted the Vulgate Bible in Psalm 42 that stated “in the same way
that a stag is drawn unto the sources of water, so is my soul drawn unto you,
God.” This German reformer who opposed the Catholic
Church was very direct in his teachings and showed us how he used Ad Fontes, or recovering the past and returning to sources. By drawing from the word of God, he was able to back up his teachings and beliefs that so many would hear throughout the years. His counterpart Erasmus around a similar time also drew from the Bible and talked about great sources, the Greeks and Ancient Romans. Humanism really shows itself through these two men, as they both were able to be such strong preachers and build followings and utilize talents that God gave them, as stated by Devan in a response to a blog post.
Church was very direct in his teachings and showed us how he used Ad Fontes, or recovering the past and returning to sources. By drawing from the word of God, he was able to back up his teachings and beliefs that so many would hear throughout the years. His counterpart Erasmus around a similar time also drew from the Bible and talked about great sources, the Greeks and Ancient Romans. Humanism really shows itself through these two men, as they both were able to be such strong preachers and build followings and utilize talents that God gave them, as stated by Devan in a response to a blog post.
Of course, these two weren't the only reformists during the Protestant
Reformation. Another Plough Boy by
the name of Jonathan Edwards in the mid-18th Century showed his
strong rhetoric and tone in his call for reformation. The Great Awakening was a
period of much religious uprising and in Edwards “Sinners in the Hands of an
Angry God,” he calls the sinner to repentance and compares them to a spider
being dangled over a burning pit of fire. In Stephanie’s blog post, she
discussed how ethos plays a huge role in this speech. Although I agree that
ethos plays a huge role, I believe there is an equal amount of logos and pathos
as well. The fact that his writings appeal to one’s character, emotions, and
logic, shows that he is able to communicate rhetorically to all.
Edwards also was evidence of ad fontes and used sources such
as the bible, but none of these plough boys would have been able to communicate
their beliefs so efficiently if it weren't for the Printing Press. Around 1450, this invention by Gutenberg allowed
for widespread publication of the Bible and religious texts. This wonderful
technology of printing was seen as magnificent as our modern day internet.
Studying and pondering about these times has helped me
solidify a great respect for what was accomplished. I now ask myself the question, how can I use this knowledge to help build the future? Can I create my own mini-Renaissance? All I know is that I plan to only build off the successes of those before me, and refuse to be condemned to repeat the greatness that already is.
It's interesting how it everything ties together. I think that it's fascinating Erasmus and Luther (and every other religious reformer for that matter) all turned back to the same source - the Bible, and yet still drew different conclusions about disputed doctrines.
ReplyDelete