In March of 1890, the Wisconsin
State Supreme Court ruled, in conclusion to the Weiss
v. the District Board case, that bible readings and devotionals in
public schools were unconstitutional. Justice H.S. Orton of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin noted the following after the ruling:
“There is no such source and cause of strife,
quarrel, fights, malignant opposition, persecution, and war, and all evil in
the state, as religion. Let it once enter our civil affairs, our government
would soon be destroyed. Let it once enter our common schools, they would be
destroyed….Those who made our Constitution saw this, and used the most apt and
comprehensive language in it to prevent such a catastrophe.”
While
Orton is “civically” correct, according to the civic philosophies of John Locke (made
constitutional
through Thomas
Jefferson), I argue that he
couldn’t be more wrong about religion within our education (or our “common schools,”
as he puts it).
Naturally, modern Americans agree with part of Orton’s claim. A brief glance at historic political tensions validates religion as a foremost cause of “strife, […] and war.” Many gruesome conquests stain the pages of our history books (e.g. the Spanish Inquisition, the First Crusade, and the Muslim conquests). But, the time has come for America to change its frame of reference. It is because of these religious tensions that America should teach religion in its schools, not in spite of them. World-wide religions, as well as world-wide theologically-based cultures, must be embraced in a new academic emphasis of true progressive tolerance.
Every
religion, without exception, has caused or received some form of injustice (physical or emotional) because of "perceived differences" in ethnicity, language, or theology. These ignorance-based “perceptions” are precisely why religions, and
their international tolerance, must become a critical part of our nation’s future public education. America’s Liberals, its progressives, have missed the mark
with education and religion. The dogma that a “separation of church and state”
equates incontrovertibly to an academic separation from religion has done
nothing but propagate a religious ignorance and intolerance within the United
States. Unity never grew without
tolerance. Tolerance never grew without knowledge. Knowledge never grew in
isolation.
I think this is a really great idea. It would be a big issue to tackle though, and the hardest part would be convincing people that the religions could be taught accurately in the schools. Even if people were able to accept religion being taught in school, it would be difficult to convince them that every religion was being fairly represented.
ReplyDeleteI really liked when we talked about this in class, Jesse, and I think it's unfortunately true what Jenna said about most ALL of these posts--dogma is not something you just go and change. But if we did change something like curricula, dogmas would probably--eventually--start to shift toward them. Learning about different people could teach us tolerance.
ReplyDeleteWell written and thought-provoking, I agree with Jennifer's comment that it would be tough to get people to agree on what was being fairly represented; think of how often the LDS Church and beliefs are portrayed in a skewed fashion. It would be interesting to see you expand on your ideas.
ReplyDelete