“Oh, you’re an English major, huh? Cool…. So, what are you
going to do with that?”
When you think about college degrees, chances are you will
start thinking about which students are more likely to get a job after they
graduate. We all know that the accounting majors will have a job and the
engineers (whatever it is they actually do) will too. The family life majors
will probably not graduate, since they’re getting married this semester—ten
bucks says they marry one of the business majors who already has a job. And so
it goes, you get the picture.
But why are the jobs we’ll have in the future more important
than the lessons we’re learning now along the way? They shouldn’t be.
Yes, I will get a degree; yes, I will get a job (contrary to
popular belief, I have lots of job options). However, if, for some reason, I
didn’t get a job, that doesn’t mean that college was a waste of time. I have
learned more about literature and the world and myself than I even thought was
possible, and that learning will serve me in more areas of my life than just
the job search.
I think it’s pretty clear that the learning should be the
most important part of education, and that seems self-evident until you hear a
conversation like this.
“Why are you going to college?”
“I’m going to be pre-med, and then in med school I’ll
probably specialize and be a cardiologist.”
Wouldn’t we live in a better world if a more common answer
was, “I’m going to school to learn more about medicine; it’s so interesting!
Hopefully, I’ll be able to specialize in cardiology and learn more about the
heart.”
So, are we here because we want to learn? Or is this just a
means to an end?
As a fellow English major, I sympathize with you. I think this idea speaks even further to the rhetorical idea of identity. In college, our identity is based on our major. After we graduate, it's based on our job. But is that really who we are? When someone asks, "What do you do," should we immediately respond, "I'm a (fill in the job here)"?
ReplyDeleteInteresting thoughts, guys. I've come across the same difficulties and questions with my major, French. So is this a need to change the view of what we value most, or how we view ourselves? Personally, I think that Jenna's idea of what we value gets down to the root dogma here. If we valued learning more than credentials or job titles, we would start to identify ourselves differently.
ReplyDelete