In the Funeral Oration of
Pericles, many different forms of rhetoric are employed. I didn't recognize
most of them when I first read it, as I was mostly focused on form and the
classic appeals. After reading “Rhetoric” by Aristotle, I was able to point out
a lot of other devices.
One of the devices that I found used was enthymeme. I didn't realize how incredibly common it was in normal speech! Trying to find examples of this in the text, I found some examples where major premises are kept and where they have been omitted. Take, for example, this line from Pericles: “To me it seems that the consummation which has overtaken these men shows us the meaning of manliness in its first revelation and in its final proof.” Here, the premise that courage and gallantry (which was stated several sentences previous and in a different context) is manly.
One of the devices that I found used was enthymeme. I didn't realize how incredibly common it was in normal speech! Trying to find examples of this in the text, I found some examples where major premises are kept and where they have been omitted. Take, for example, this line from Pericles: “To me it seems that the consummation which has overtaken these men shows us the meaning of manliness in its first revelation and in its final proof.” Here, the premise that courage and gallantry (which was stated several sentences previous and in a different context) is manly.

Reading this text again, I also noticed the very epideictic as well as deliberative aspects of the speech. It is epideictic in the sense that Pericles is talking to a large crowd and praising the men who fought. It is deliberative in the fact that he is exhorting future measures. He is calling the families of these
Pericles also uses his own testimony to add
credibility. In the first few lines he speaks about having a first-hand witness
or reliable second-hand testimony of the accounts of battle. Pericles says “I
have described nothing but what I either saw myself, or learned from others of
whom I made careful and particular inquiry.” If this isn't a direct proof of
testimony displayed, I don’t know what is!