Showing posts with label Norway. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Norway. Show all posts

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Should the Songs of One Man Ravage the Culture of Another?


Home Radio
As of the advent of radio music civilizations have been supplementing their ancestral heritage with that of musical pop-culture from far away nations.  This is a situation in which “what a work is man” gets taken to the extreme, with one man taking center stage for an entire culture.  Since the mid 1920’s radio broadcasting many singers to new audiences, by the 1930’s foreign pop-cultures centered on specific singers began to grow in many nations.

"Ut externus alieno pene non sit hominis vice." ["As a foreigner cannot be said to supply us the place of a man."]  And yet, without even gaining the citizenship of the worshiped artist, populations trade a significant part of their dress, time and music with that of foreign singers.

Justin Bieber in Norway
Recently the Canadian singer Justin Bieber became a huge hit in Norway. When he visited in 2012 about 50 fans were injured by each other in the commotion before his performance trying to get closer to where he would be.  How did the proud Norwegians, who fought wars for over 50 years to gain independence as a nation from, the Danish, become so focused on a single Canadian boy?  Any artist, through music, converting masses of fans from other nations seems unbalanced.  

But then, perhaps the pop-artist whose music travels on the waves of the air, is no longer a man of one nation.  "Quisquis ubique habitat, Maxime, nusquam habitat." ["He who lives everywhere, lives nowhere.]  

Perhaps their contribution to civilization enhances the music and art of the world in a general fashion.  Artists such as Shakespeare influenced the world’s popular culture though mass publication.  Was Shakespeare’s art a benefit to the civilization of the world?  It did help standardize English linguistics for many nations today. 


Where is the loyalty of the modern pop-artist?  To the art?  Their nation?  It seems today to belong instead to wealth and fame.  If the communication of art from one nation to another homogenizes world cultures and erases national tradition, then it is for money that ancestral identity is being stolen.